J'accepte les dons en crypto (BitCoin, Ethereum ou BitCoin Cash).
Si vous ne savez pas encore comment procéder, je vous invite à visionner ce tuto-vidéo en français.
Vous pouvez me contacter par email - - ou via ma page Facebook

dimanche 25 juin 2017

Russiagate : vers l’effondrement du Parti démocrate US

« Malgré les énormes ressources consacrées à l'enquête, qui a duré un an, les sénateurs démocrates sont contraints de reconnaître qu'aucune preuve d'une connivence avec les Russes n'a été trouvée » écrit Assange sur TwitLonger le 24 juin 2017 et prédit l’effondrement du Parti démocrate US. 

Ci-dessous, l’article de Sputnik suivi du texte complet d’Assange sur TwitLonger (en anglais)

Bonne lecture


Assange prédit l’effondrement du Parti démocrate US

La politique et la rhétorique actuelle du Parti démocrate américain, qui ne cesse d’accuser la Russie d’avoir été de mèche avec Donald Trump, le mènera dans une impasse, avertit le fondateur du site WikiLeaks.

Le lanceur d'alerte Julian Assange, fondateur du site WikiLeaks, a rédigé un texte qui prédit l'effondrement du Parti démocrate américain s'il ne change pas de politique.
«La rhétorique sur une prétendue connivence entre Donald Trump et la Russie est une impasse politique», a affirmé M. Assange sur TwitLonger
Malgré les énormes ressources consacrées à l'enquête, qui a duré un an, les sénateurs démocrates sont contraints de reconnaître qu'aucune preuve d'une connivence avec les Russes n'a été trouvée, souligne-t-il.
Les élites du Parti démocrate n'ont pas l'intention de renoncer au pouvoir de leur bon gré, ce qui menace de naufrage l'ensemble du système de ce parti.
En tant qu'exemple à suivre, Julian Assange a cité les campagnes électorales d'Emmanuel Macron en France et de Bernie Sanders et de Donald Trump aux États-Unis, qui ont été construites «à partir de rien».
Les élites démocrates perdront le contrôle ou seront balayées par une nouvelle structure, comme ce fut le cas avec Emmanuel Macron et son mouvement «En marche!» en France, avertit le lanceur d'alerte.

Why the Democratic party is doomed
Why the Democratic party is doomed:

1. The Democratic establishment has vortexed the party's narrative energy into hysteria about Russia (a state with a lower GDP than South Korea). It is starkly obvious that were it not for this hysteria insurgent narratives of the type promoted by Bernie Sanders would rapidly dominate the party's base and its relationship with the public. Without the "We didn't lose, Russia won" narrative the party's elite and those who exist under its patronage would be purged for being electorally incompetent and ideologically passe. The collapse of the Democratic vote over the last eight years is at every level, city, state, Congressional and presidential. It corresponds to the domination of Democratic decision making structures by a professional service class and to a shocking decline in the health and longevity of white males, whom together with their wives, daughters, mothers and sisters comprise 63% of the US population (2010 census). Democratic campaigns have conspicuously promoted racial and sexual identity politics (for everyone but whites and males). This delineated and alienated white and male identity grievance classes, pushing these majorities into the arms of GOP dog racial and sexual dog-whistling (53% of all men voted for Trump, 53% of white women and 63% of white men according to PEW Research). Unlike other industrialized countries US male real wages wages (all ethnic groups combined) not have not increased since 1973.

2. The Trump-Russia collusion narrative is a political dead end. Despite vast resources, enormous incentives and a year of investigation, Democratic senators who have seen the classified intelligence at CIA HQ such as Senator Feinstein (as recently as March) are forced to admit that there is no evidence of collusion []. Without collusion, we are left with the Democratic establishment blaming the public for not liking the truth about what Hillary Clinton said to Goldman Sachs and blaming their own base for not liking what they said in their own emails about about fixing the DNC primaries.

3. The Democrat establishment needs the support of the security sector and media barons to push this diversionary conspiracy agenda, so they ingratiate themselves with these two classes leading to further perceptions that the Democrats act on behalf of an entrenched power elite. Eventually, Trump or Pence will 'merge' with the security state leaving Democrats in a vulnerable position having talked up two deeply unaccountable traditionally Republican-aligned organizations, in particular, the CIA and the FBI, who will be turned against them. Other than domestic diversion and geopolitical destabilization the primary result of the Russian narrative is increased influence and funding for the security sector which is primarily GOP owned or aligned.

4. The twin result is to place the primary self-interest concerns of most Americans, class competition, freedom from crime and ill health and the empowerment of their children, into the shadows and project the Democrats as close to the DC and media elites. This has further cemented Trump's anti-establishment positioning and fettered attacks on Trump's run away embrace of robber barons, dictators and gravitas free buffoon's like the CIA's Mike Pompeo.

5. GOP/Trump has open goals everywhere: broken promises, inequality, economy, healthcare, militarization, Goldman Sachs, Saudi Arabia & cronyism, but the Democrat establishment can't kick these goals since the Russian collusion narrative has consumed all its energy and it is entangled with many of the same groups behind Trump's policies.

6. The Democratic base should move to start a new party since the party elite shows no signs that they will give up power. This can be done quickly and cheaply as a result of the internet and databases of peoples' political preferences. This reality is proven in practice with the rapid construction of the Macron, Sanders and Trump campaigns from nothing. The existing Democratic party may well have negative reputational capital, stimulating a Macron-style clean slate approach. Regardless, in the face of such a threat, the Democratic establishment will either concede control or, as in the case of Macron, be eliminated by the new structure.